Costco Gas Station Question and Notes
11/10/2007 & 2/16/2008
Combined
Misc
question
- What did the Planning
Commission say about Costco’s amendment request? (Janice will check her notes).
- Would the City of Kirkland be willing
to invest in improvements to mitigate problems?
- Would Costco be willing to
invest in improvements to mitigate problems?
- Who is paying for the
consultant? Should City of Kirkland pay? If City pays, there is a perception of
bias.
- We need to study City of Kirkland goal to
develop revenue generation here.
- There is a lack of trust that
current proposal will not become a problem.
Economic
Issues
- How much revenue does Costco
stand to gain from the gas station?
- How much does the City of Kirkland stand to
gain in taxes?
- What are the potential
impacts to the other five gas stations on 85th?
- Decrease in property values
because of environmental concerns.
- Is there a way to compensate
adjacent property owners for decrease in property value?
- Inability for adjacent
property owners to sell property to Costco.
Traffic
- What is the average number of
cars at other Costco gas stations?
- Parking – where do the other
200 stalls come in?
- What are the specific
requirements for parking?
- No one goes down 90th
“passing by.” People will veer off
of 85th.
- People exit off 405 to cut
through on 124th – a gas station in the vicinity will increase
people using this cut through.
- Cut through traffic on 126th/128th
(avoiding traffic lights on 124th and on 85th) and
the lack of sidewalks.
- Has there been a traffic
study related to cut through traffic
- Internet shopping for
inexpensive gas often points to Costco and people may make this gas
station a destination trip just for low cost gas.
- Trucks on 90th –
the road is not wide enough to handle.
- There is a lack of sidewalks
on NE 90th can sidewalks be added?
- If adjacent properties decide
to develop, will there be enough traffic capacity to accommodate those
needs?
- Nighttime truck traffic.
- Accidents on straight in
stalls?
- Back up traffic when exit and
entrance are closed.
- On 90th as it
approaches 124th, at 5 pm, is totally backed up. How will that increase?
- Original promise (from the
traffic engineers) when Costco came in was no traffic problems.
- Traffic studies underestimate
increased traffic demands and are optimistic.
- When counting cars for
traffic, do it with eyes because it is easy to see where the traffic comes
from.
- Can Costco get its own
exit/entrance off I-405?
- Could 2
left turn lanes be on 120th?
- Could Costco buy the corner
gas station on 85th and 120th ?
Environmental
Concerns
- Lighting, especially regard
to senior housing.
- Noise from delivery trucks
(fuel trucks)
- Fumes from waiting cars.
- Gas and oil spill off on the
road and parking lot (cars waiting in line before the “dip point.”
- Increased pollution if site
is changed to currently zoned area.
- Fumes to retirement home.
- Will there be nighttime
truck traffic.
- Minimize fumes beyond
requirements.
Zoning
issues
- Community members put in a
large amount of time and energy into the sub-area plan for Kirkland. Putting a gas
stations next to residential zoning was not part of the plan.
- Will the zoning change be only
for Costco property?
- “Auto-oriented” use is
intended to relate to car dealerships (and other auto-type traffic like
drive-ins, etc). Intended to force
the auto-related businesses towards 85th and the freeway. Not intended to encourage businesses
into the neighborhoods.
Local
Neighbors property
- Property values have decrease
because of environmental concerns.
- What will be the impact on the
Senior Housing apartments?
- Have the neighbors in the
area been sent a notice individually about the gas station
development?
Suggestions
for Costco
- Could the site at the Home
Store location at Totem
Lake.
- Will low ground lights be
used that shine away from the adjacent properties?.
- Will there be restricted
times for delivery and garbage.
- Is there some way to compensate
adjacent property owners for decrease in property value?
Storm
drainage problem
- Set up separate meeting for
storm drainage/wetland issue with City of Kirkland, Costco, consultants and
wetland neighbors. Bring City expert on water and drainage and development
- The City has responsibility for
drainage.
- A real way to address
drainage that includes multiple agencies – bigger than just the Costco gas
station effort.
- Storm water system is
inadequate – property values are influenced by City drainage.
- Inability to build or sell
because of wetland issue.
- No compensation for
landowners re: drainage.
- Drainage problems have
increased because of Costco.
- There has been a change in
water table since 1989.
- Inability for adjacent
property owners to sell property to Costco.
- Dispute over wetland
designation of adjacent properties.
- City planning has caused the
increased water saturation in that area.
- Silted ditch.
- Centrifuge silt removal
system?
- Flooding in area of potential
sidewalks
- Why has there been massive
drainage on one end of the lake and it is prohibited on the other area?
- What impact has I405 had on Forbes Lake drainage?
- How are sub-divided lots
regulated related to drainage?
- How does the water storage on
Costco property disperse once it is silted up?
- What is the system to remove
sediment load on Forbes ditch?